Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2017-05-15 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2017-05-15 House Journal Page 1423 HB 132 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the May 13 calendar (page 1383), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 132(L&C) "An Act relating to transportation network companies and transportation network company drivers; and providing for an effective date." Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 132(L&C) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Speaker stated that, without objection, CSHB 132(L&C) would be returned to second reading for all amendments. 2017-05-15 House Journal Page 1424 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Kawasaki, Josephson, Parish, Knopp, and Tuck: Page 13, line 26, through page 14, line 19: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill section accordingly. Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Johnston objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Knopp, Ortiz, Parish, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Edgmon, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Kito, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Sullivan-Leonard, Thompson, Tilton, Westlake, Wilson, Wool Absent: Reinbold And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representatives Josephson, Kawasaki, Seaton, Parish, Knopp, and Tuck: Page 14, line 11: Delete "ratified by the voters in a regular municipal election" Representative Josephson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. 2017-05-15 House Journal Page 1425 Representative Birch objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 20 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Knopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Kito, Kopp, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson, Wool And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted.